Saturday, May 9, 2009

Boldly remaking the Final Frontier? Star Trek has arrived on the big screen

Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov, Chris Pine as James T. Kirk, Simon Pegg as Montgomery 'Scotty' Scott, Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy, John Cho as Hikaru Sulu and Zoe Saldana as Uhura, Zachary Quinto as Spock, Eric Bana as Nero in Paramount Pictures' Star Trek - 2009

Well, I can't say I was apprehensive regarding whether the new Star Trek reboot film would be good or not. It seems that there is enough inertia behind director/producers like JJ Abrams that they at least attempt to produce something that is watchable. Star Trek, in this case, is not only watchable, its pretty darn good.
I won't get into spoilers here, so don't worry about me blurting out a key plot point.
What I will say is the movie is rather well cast. Most of the actors were transparent to the roles they were in, with the exception of the appearance of Leonard Nimoy - I'm not spoiling anything there - it has been ballyhooed that Spock/Nimoy appears in the film at some point.

Something I have to say - I attempted to avoid as much of the media hype for this movie as possible. I largely succeeded. Early on I did surf IMDB for the cast members, at least for the Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Scotty, etc. And I did indulge in a few of the trailers that were released last year and about a month ago.

Often times I find that the information put in place to promote a movie either spoils it, or somehow dilutes the enjoyment. My main reason for avoidance is - I didn't want to dwell on whether it would be a good remake or speculate on whether this was "true" to the original actors. That would not be fair to this film, other than - it is incumbent upon whomever is remaking a franchise to pony up to the table and deliver the goods - if you are going to "remake" the original, be as fresh and interesting as you can, advertise it for what it is, and (in my opinion) try to honor the spirit of the original. Otherwise, what is the point? You could have renamed it whatever you want - and it would probably do just as well. Of course, there's no such thing as bad press, and everyone loves to rubber neck at a crash site, right? Some movies rely on that if they are going to suck.

This one, happily, didn't.

Eric Bana plays a Romulan named Nero - I didn't realize he was in the film until I saw the credits. I was aware I had seen the face before somewhere. Transparent to the role. I am not a big fan of Eric Bana, but I'm not a detractor either. He was good in Troy, and though I didn't care much for the film, the Hulk.

Zachary Quinto plays the part of Spock far better than I had thought. I expected him to be more like "Sylar", if I'm being honest. He doesn't have Leonard Nimoy's ability to maintain an impassive face, at least as was portrayed in the original series. But all things considered, he gave a rather good performance.

Chris Pike makes a good James T. Kirk. I can't say I heard of him before this movie, which is ok. But he does the role credit.

Anton Yelchin - the fresh faced Pavel Chekov of the film - he had some techno babble, was very geeky eager, and they played up his faux-Russian accent quite heavily. I can't say I was over thrilled with the character, but I was not put off by it either.
Simon Pegg plays Scotty, and he wasn't bad, though maybe in future installments, they will actually focus on the man and the character more, rather than the sound byte "I'm giv'n 'er all she's got Cap'n!".

Karl Urban was wonderful as McCoy. I can't say enough how much I enjoyed his portrayal. I have become a fan of his from this role.

John Cho's Sulu was developed in a mid-range way. I guess they didn't want the characters to be taken too seriously, yet tried to give them weight and merit. But overall, he wasn't bad in the role at all. He wasn't gay enough *laugh* though.

Zoe Saldana playing Uhura - I am ... conflicted here. I won't say much about this, but I can see what they were doing and why. Zoe Saldana gave a good performance, no doubt. But - well, you decide if I'm being over critical for the way her character was slotted in. But of all the characters, I'm not sure this one is as true to the character portrayed by Nichelle Nichols. Not the actor's fault, but a matter of plot/scripting.

Another person to note - Bruce Greenwood was an excellent Captain Christopher Pike. I can't say enough of how much I enjoyed his portrayal of this character. In a lot of ways, he should have gotten more screen time than he did. Excellent job.

Overall, the Enterprise herself got a facelift on the outside. Its a very familiar design, more "artistic" than the original series version. They didn't dwell much on the details of the ship, so I would not go in expecting that. Interior shots of Engineering didn't seem to jive well with the sort of ship it should have been, but then, I guess pipes and tubes have to be routed from somewhere.

Anyway, long story short - I'd see this film again. Probably will. And if you've seen it, and want to discuss, let me know and we can talk about all the things I didn't put in this review.


  1. Curse you Dehrynn!!! now i HAE to go see this movie and probally will today! *shakes his fists furiously* and thanks for the quick non biased review =D

  2. I saw this film today :D and you ruined my idea for posting a review of it!!! *shakes fist*

    I am not a big Trekkie - I have seen alot of the Next Generation and Voyager and a bit of the original series and most of the movies - but - I never really became attached to the characters. Some people seem to think this movie would float or sink depending on how well the new cast could replicate the old cast.

    I say balls to that. This movie fucking rocks, end of story. They have reinvented Star Trek and I prefer the way it is now to the old series and films. The effects are incredible. The jokes are funny. The environments are breathtaking. The setting is believable and complete - there is no moment where you are not totally immersed in this future or brought back to reality by a little hole somewhere.

    I dont think any series or film or whatever, or any character, should be placed in some kind of 'holy' area, beyond the realms of mortal hands where messing with them is sacrilege. Remakes, re-imaginings and revivals are brilliant and keep things fresh.

    I love this movie. I'd go and see it again right now if I could.

    Nice review, Dehrynn, by the way lol :D

  3. Anyone that is going into this movie wanting to see Star Trek simply with the actors replaced by younger ones - no, its not that simple.
    Its strange - some of my closest friends that I thought would really like the movie have criticized it as 'unwatchable'. They went into the movie looking for a remake of the original - and this isn't "the original". Make no mistake, and maybe this was lacking in my review - this is NOT a simple retelling of Kirk and crew getting together at the academy. This is a new Star Trek with its own destiny to forge, rather than redoing a Star Trek that has gone before.
    Its miles away different, but think of the remake of Battlestar Galactica - quite different from the original.
    I will say that I think the Trek that went before, in its heyday was excellent, minus the paper mache sets and dated special effects. Next Generation, DS9, Voyager, and Enterprise were really good series. They built on each other for a massive universe. However, this is a new Trek, and I'm waiting to see where it goes. Let's hope it goes where it needs to go, boldly, where no man (or no one) has gone before.

  4. I would so, so, so love to see them turn this into a TV series, with the same cast.. weekly episodes.. just like the old ones.. imagine how fucking awesome that'd be.

  5. Me too. I wonder if that is even being discussed...